Rain v. Rolls-Royce Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
626 F.3d 372 · 2010
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Williamson · Pisciotta v. Old National Bancorp · Hurlbut v. Gulf Atlantic Life Insurance Co. · Diginet, Incorporated v. Western Union Ats, Incorporated, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“application of the privilege here allows [the manufacturer] to pursue its claims against third parties without fear of future legal liability arising out of its efforts to protect its intellectual property rights. By contrast, the failure to apply the privilege would frustrate the underlying policy by discouraging [the manufacturer] from exercising its fundamental right to resort to the courts to protect its rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Indiana state law, the court's goal in interpreting a contract is to 'give effect to the parties' intent as reasonably manifested by the language of the agreement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] false and injurious statement that discredits or detracts from the reputation of another's property, product, or business.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.