Douglas v. Jacquez’s Empirical Analysis
626 F.3d 501 · 2010
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · Burks v. United States · Benton v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] California state trial court can modify the judgment from a conviction under § 451(b) to a [lesser] conviction under § 451(c).... Instead of directing the trial court to enter a judgment under § 451(c), the district court should have granted a conditional writ of habe-as corpus and ordered that [petitioner’s] conviction under § 451(b) be vacated only if the state court did not resentence him within a reasonable time, such as 90 days. The state court would thus have an opportunity to correct its own constitutional error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lujan v. Garcia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.