626 F. Supp. 2d 30 - Curran v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 25 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Foman v. Davis · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Hagans v. Lavine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presents a threshold challenge to the Court's jurisdiction ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Court is obligated to determine whether it has subject-matter jurisdiction in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. Spencer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.