Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 NE2D 795 - Wickizer v. State

Wickizer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Hicks v. State (1997), Wynn v. State (1998)

79 state decisions

380199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rideout v. United States · Lockhart v. Nelson · Poland v. Arizona · Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington · Halas v. Department of Energy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “genuinely relevant to prove the defendant's intent at the time of the charged offense.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(b) Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts. Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon request by the accused, the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, or during trial if the court exeuses pre-trial notice on good cause shown, of the general nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial."”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon request by the accused, the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, or during trial if the court excuses pre-trial notice on good cause shown, of the general nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.