Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 So. 2d 111 - Davis v. Davis

626 So. 2d 111 - Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2010

7 state decisions

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408

Relies on Brabham v. Brabham · 597 So. 2d 653 - Hammonds v. Hammonds · 519 So. 2d 891 - Carpenter v. Carpenter · Tutor v. Tutor · 568 So. 2d 255 - Powers v. Powers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [chancellor] did not assign [the wife] one-half of her husband’s military retirement. If the [chancellor] had awarded [her] one-half of the entitlement as authorized by the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408 , such award could, unless specifically defined, be construed as part of the parties’ property settlement, not subject to modification. The chancellor avoided this consequence’ and left an important open avenue for modification in the event conditions change necessitating reconsideration of the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.