626 So. 2d 178 - The Florida Bar v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2016
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 515 So. 2d 1280 - Florida Bar v. Greene · 517 So. 2d 11 - Florida Bar v. Treiman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 3-7 .6(e)(1), once a formal complaint has been filed and forwarded to a referee for hearing, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure apply except where otherwise provided in the rule. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c) provides for summary judgment where ... it is shown there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Daniel clearly was afforded an opportunity to be heard; the fact that he voluntarily chose not to take advantage of that opportunity does not offend due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.