Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

626 So. 2d 254

Stearns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-10-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2011

3 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“WHETHER A DEFENDANT WHO, IN THE COURSE OF ONE CRIMINAL TRANSACTION OR EPISODE, COMMITS AND IS CONVICTED OF BURGLARY OF A STRUCTURE WHILE ARMED AND GRAND THEFT OF PROPERTY FOUND THEREIN MAY, CONSISTENT WITH DOUBLE JEOPARDY PRINCIPLES, ALSO BE CONVICTED OF CARRYING A CONCEALED WEAPON WHILE COMMITTING THE GRAND THEFT.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 645 So. 2d 417 - State v. Stearns

“Armed burglary, as contrasted with mere burglary, is, as defined in section 810.02(2), Florida Statutes, a continuing offense. The state cannot, consistent with double jeopardy principles, charge, convict, and sentence a defendant for two offenses for the single act of possession of one weapon.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 645 So. 2d 417 - State v. Stearns

Relies on Anders v. California · Cleveland v. State · 483 So. 2d 420 - State v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COBB, Judge.

¶1The defendant was charged with burglary of a structure while armed (§ 810.-02(2), Fla.Stat. (1991)), grand theft (§ 812.-014(2), Fla.Stat. (1991)), and carrying a concealed weapon while committing a felony, to wit: grand theft (§ 790.07(2), Fla.Stat. (1991)). Based upon the defendant’s plea of guilty, the court adjudicated him guilty of all three charges and sentenced him. The public defender filed an Anders1 brief but this court ordered a supplemental brief because the record reveals a double jeopardy issue. See generally Johnson v. State, 460 So.2d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), aff'd, 483 So.2d 420 (Fla.1986) (violation of double jeopardy rights constitutes fundamental error). That issue concerns whether a defendant, who commits an armed burglary of a structure and grand theft of property found therein, can also be convicted of carrying a concealed weapon while committing a felony. We answer this question in the negative.

¶2Armed burglary, as contrasted with mere burglary, is, as defined in section 810.02(2), Florida Statutes, a continuing offense. See Williams v. State, 517 So.2d 681 (Fla.1988); Jones v. State, 599 So.2d 741 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). The state cannot, consistent with double jeopardy principles, charge, convict and sentence a defendant for two offenses for the single act of possession of one weapon. See generally Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991). The conviction and sentence for carrying a concealed weapon while committing a felony are reversed. See also Brown v. State, 617 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (defendant could not be convicted and sentenced for possession of firearm during commission of felony and armed robbery with a firearm arising out of the same criminal episode even though felony underlying possession charge was attempted first degree murder). The defendant’s remaining convictions and sentences are affirmed.

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

DIAMANTIS, J., concurs.PETERSON, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.

¶4. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/626/so2d/254 · .json · Public domain