Rucker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · 616 So. 2d 1 - State v. Johnson · 373 So. 2d 78 - King v. State · 389 So. 2d 712 - Massey v. State · 538 So. 2d 923 - Sanchez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION, CREDIT PREVIOUS TIME SERVED ON PROBATION TOWARD ANY NEWLY-IMPOSED TERM OF PROBATION SO THAT THE TOTAL PROBATIONARY TERM IS SUBJECT TO THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.