Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

626 So. 2d 342

Rozier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-11-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on 510 So. 2d 1155 - Cliburn v. State · 579 So. 2d 900 - Watson v. State · 615 So. 2d 222 - Turkaly v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the restitution ordered for expenses to cover the cost of the victim’s inpatient treatment. The restitution ordered for the travel expenses and lost wages of the mother of the victim are stricken, however. See Watson v. State, 579 So.2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA1991); Cliburn v. State, 510 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA1987). We also strike the “state attorney’s fee.” E.g., Turkaly v. State, 615 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA1993).

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/626/so2d/342 · .json · Public domain