State v. Knapper’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Nix v. Williams · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Cherek v. United States · Rogers v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the prosecution can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the information ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliver · State v. Cook“doctrine, holding that evidence found as a result of a violation of a defendant's constitutional rights, would be admissible”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliver · State v. Cook“has been followed by Louisiana courts. State v. Nelson, 459 So.2d 510 (La.1984), cert. den., Nelson v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1030 , 105 S.Ct. 2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); State v. Clark, 499 So.2d 332 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986). Under the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.