626 So. 2d 459 - State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Scharffe v. Perkins · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · Marquez v. Texas · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as provided in Paragraph B of this Article, a juror must rely upon his memory in reaching a verdict. He shall not be permitted to refer to notes or to have access to any written evidence. Testimony shall not be repeated to the jury. Upon the request of a juror and in the discretion of the court, the jury may take with it or have sent to it any object or document received in evidence when a physical examination thereof is required to enable the jury to arrive at a verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nightengale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.