Guidroz v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 360 So. 2d 1331 - Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Smith · 582 So. 2d 1263 - Gilboy v. American Tobacco Co. · 445 So. 2d 1221 - Terrebonne v. South Lafourche Tidal Control · 452 So. 2d 390 - Morrison on Behalf of Morrison v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“2. Exclusions. This Insurance does not apply to: * * * * * * c. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" for which any insured may be held liable by reason of: (1) Causing or contributing to the intoxication of any person; (2) The furnishing of alcoholic beverages to a person under the legal drinking age or under the influence of alcohol; or (3) Any statute, ordinance or regulation relating to the sale, gift, distribution or use of alcoholic beverages. This exclusion applies only if you are in the business of manufacturing, distributing, selling, serving or furnishing alcoholic beverages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any insurance policy, rider, or endorsement hereafter issued and otherwise valid, which contains any condition or provision not in compliance with the requirements of this Code, shall not be rendered invalid thereby, but shall be construed and applied in accordance with such conditions and provisions as would have applied had such policy, rider or endorsement been in full compliance with this Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In the absence of legislative intent to the contrary, we find no reason to limit the ability of contractual freedom of the parties....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.