State v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2019
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Shadwick v. City of Tampa · State v. Cabbage · McBee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)(1)(A) The chief legislative body of any county having a population of ... over 700,000 ... may appoint one or more judicial commissioners whose duty or duties shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (i) issuance of search warrants and felony arrest warrants upon a finding of probable cause and pursuant to requests from on-duty law enforcement officers and in accordance with the procedures outlined in chapters 5 and 6 of this title; (ii) Issuance of mittimus following compliance with the procedures prescribed by § 40-5-103; (iii) The appointing of attorneys for indigent defendants in accordance with applicable law and guidelines established by the presiding general sessions judge of the county; (iv) The setting and approving of bonds and the release on recognizance of defendants in accordance with applicable law and guidelines established by the presiding general sessions judge of the count; and (v) Issuance of injunctions and other appropriate orders as designated by the general sessions judges in cases of alleged domestic violence. (B) The term or terms of the officers shall be established by the chief legislative body of the counties but shall not exceed a four-year term. No member of the county legislative body shall be eligible for appointment as a judicial commissioner ... The legislative body of any county, in appointing, evaluating and making decisions relative to retention and reappointment shall take into consideration views, comments and suggestions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.