Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 SW2D 734 - Jones v. Cable

Jones v. Cable’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2003

17 state decisions

150198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Watts v. Watts · Jones v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. there was a change in the circumstances of the child or parent so material and substantial that 2. retention of the present managing conservator would be injurious to the welfare of the child; and 3. the appointment of a new managing conservator would be a positive improvement for the child.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(c) . . . (1) ... the circumstances of the child or parent have so materially and substantially changed since the entry of the order or decree to be modified that the retention of the present managing conservator would be injurious to the welfare of the child and that the appointment of the new managing conservator would be a positive improvement for the child....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the appointment if LAWRENCE J. RUTLAND as the new managing conservator would be a positive improvement for the children? ANSWER: “We do” or “We do not.” ANSWER: We do”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.