Katz v. King’s Empirical Analysis
627 F.2d 568 · 1980
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2015 · most notably Rose v. Lundy (1982), Conkling v. Turner (1994)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Picard v. Connor · Hill v. United States · Gardner v. Florida · Mempa v. Rhay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If counsel desires our consideration of a particular argument, the argument must appear within the four corners of the brief filed in this court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“not unreasonable and certainly not of constitutional dimensions”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hile with hindsight one can find in the state court records seeds of the argument, so vigorously urged in the federal courts, ... the seeds never came to visible fruition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.