Campbell v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
627 F.3d 299 · 2010
Citation profile
68
cited by 68 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Villano v. Astrue · Skinner v. Astrue · Bauer v. Astrue · Castile v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the regulations require the ALJ to consider the length, nature, and extent of the treatment relationship, frequency of examination, the physician's specialty, the types of tests performed, and the consistency and supportability of the physician's opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Berryhill“An ALJ may not selectively discuss portions of a physician's report that support a finding of non-disability while ignoring other portions that suggest a disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with other substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.