Hebbe v. Pliler’s Empirical Analysis
627 F.3d 338 · 2010
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Wolff v. McDonnell · Heck v. Humphrey · Erickson v. Pardus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 361 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur ‘obligation’ remains [after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 , 129 S.Ct. 1937 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009)], ‘where the petitioner is pro se, particularly in civil rights cases, to construe the pleadings liberally and to afford the petitioner the benefit of any doubt.' ”) (citation omitted); Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir.2011) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coleman v. Donahoe“did not alter the courts' treatment of pro se filings; accordingly, we continue to construe pro se filings liberally when evaluating them under Iqbal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.