Kaczmarek v. Rednour’s Empirical Analysis
627 F.3d 586 · 2010
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Coleman v. Thompson · Singleton v. Wulff · United States v. Cotton · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A state law ground that provides the basis for a state court decision is independent when the court actually relied on the procedural bar as an independent basis for its disposition of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“guarantees a criminal defendant the fundamental right to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges made against him so as to permit adequate preparation of a defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a firmly established and regularly followed state practice at the time it [was] applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thompson v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.