Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 627 F.3d 768 - Roberts v. Marshall

Roberts v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

627 F.3d 768 · 2010

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Evans v. Chavis · Laws v. Aa Lamarque · Roy v. Lampert · Gaston v. Palmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, a litigant seeking equitable tolling bears the burden of establishing two elements: (1) that he has been pursuing his rights diligently; and (2) that some extraordinary circumstances stood in his way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.