Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 627 NE2D 427 - Fair v. State

Fair v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
4
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Brown v. State (1995), Bieghler v. State (1997)

75 state decisions

330199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Mincey v. Arizona · South Dakota v. Opperman · Sedillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the belief that the vehicle posed some threat or harm to the community or was itself imperiled was consistent with objective standards of sound policing,”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “In borderline cases, however, the ultimate character of the search is often most clearly revealed when both the necessitousness of the impoundment and the serupulousness of the inventorying are viewed together.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “police are expected not only to enforce the criminal laws but also to aid those in distress, abate hazards, prevent potential hazards from materializing, and perform an infinite variety of other tasks calculated to enhance and maintain the safety of communities”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.