Apodaca v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Keffer (1993), Lancaster v. State (2002)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Marable · United States v. Bommarito · United States v. Knowles · Jasch v. State · Matter of Estate of Mora
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the evidence had little or no probative value and that it was extremely inflammatory or introduced for the purpose of inflaming the jury.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Any person who ... conspires to commit any offense under this article ... shall be punished by imprisonment or fine or both....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gilliam v. State · Wehr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.