Lowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2015
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scott v. Rosenberg · Danial Siebert v. Alabama · 555 So. 2d 780 - Ex Parte Siebert · 535 So. 2d 228 - Lewis v. State · United States v. Rouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`[A]ny conduct or declaration of a person having relation to the offense he is suspected of or charged with, indicating a consciousness of guilt, is admissible evidence against him.' Knox v. State, 571 So.2d 389 , 391 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), quoting Sparks v. State, 376 So.2d 834 , 843 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979). Also, `[t]he acts, declarations and demeanor of an accused before or after the offense whether part of the res gestae or not are admissible against him.' Id., quoting Smoot v. State, 376 So.2d 834 , 843 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pressley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.