627 So. 2d 1131 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lane v. Holderman · 547 So. 2d 68 - Ex Parte Brannon · 431 So. 2d 574 - Trawick v. State · Meyering v. Miller · 479 So. 2d 1377 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The legislative intent is that the five-year penalties shall not run concurrently with each other or any other sentence imposed. The enhancement terms provided for by these statutes must be `added to' any other penalty pronounced by the court."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'cannot consider matters on appeal that have not first been presented to [the] trial court for its determination.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Clay v. State · Callahan v. State“" In addition to any penalties heretofore or hereafter provided by law for any person convicted of an unlawful sale of a controlled substance, there is hereby imposed a penalty of five years incarceration in a state corrections facility with no provision for probation if the situs of such unlawful sale was on the campus or within a three-mile radius of the campus boundaries of any public or private school, college, university or other educational institution in this state."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bryant v. State · Nye v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.