¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions and the order placing him on probation following his plea of nolo contendere. We strike that portion of the judgment which requires payments to the “Court Improvement Fund” and “Hillsborough County Drug Fund,” without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of these non-statutory costs after proper notice to appellant. See, e.g., Alfonso v. State, 595 So.2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
627 So. 2d 30
Douglas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 10, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-11-10
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1996
4 state decisions
Relies on Alfonso v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-11-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →