Martinez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (§ 275 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on 378 So. 2d 7 - Rodriguez v. State · 618 So. 2d 734 - Biller v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although entering the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers can constitute a crime, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1325 , the record does not establish that the [defendant's] presence in the United States is in itself criminal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to future criminality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.