Schweinberg v. Click’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2010
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 438 So. 2d 830 - Florida Bar v. Imand · 322 So. 2d 22 - Dinkel v. Dinkel · 444 So. 2d 1034 - Zediker v. Zediker · Teta v. Teta · 383 So. 2d 1183 - Stricklin v. Stricklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Trial courts are granted a great deal of deference in child custody matters because they are able to see and judge the witnesses much better than an appellate court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. Allen“[t]he children's wishes alone, however, cannot support a change in custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Mere frustration of visitation alone is insufficient to change custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.