627 So. 2d 741 - State v. Black’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2014
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton · State v. Jacobs · State v. Shapiro · 535 So. 2d 963 - State v. Lott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at the time of the unauthorized entry, it is proper to consider whether the occupant deemed the house to be his place of abode and whether he treated it as such. Conn, supra . In State v. Black, 627 So.2d 741 (La. App.2d Cir.1993), this court held that a house which is lived in for only part of the time may be classified as”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“... the unauthorized entry of any inhabited dwelling, house, apartment or other structure used in whole or in part as a home or place of abode by a person ... with the intent to commit a felony or theft therein....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Again, the case before us is different in that there was no evidence presented to reasonably show that defendant was in the house due to illness or intoxication, or the need to sleep-off any intoxication. Finally, defendant relies upon State v. Marcello, 385 So.2d 244 (La.1980), wherein the defendant entered a public building to use soap and water to clean up. The court found no proof of intent to steal or commit another felony; however, nothing was missing, except soap and paper towels. In this case, clothing and curtains were missing. The defendant's hypothesis of innocence, that he was seeking refuge and sleep, is not sufficiently reasonable and strong under these circumstances to have led the jury to entertain a reasonable doubt about guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.