Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 627 So. 2d 855 - Bui v. State

627 So. 2d 855 - Bui v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Taylor v. State (1994), 695 So. 2d 70 - Bush v. State (1996)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

250199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Ex Parte Branch · Edwards v. Chile Copper Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[I]n reviewing allegations that the prosecutor exercised the state's peremptory strikes in a racially discriminatory manner,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial judge's determination in each case that peremptory challenges were not racially motivated is, ordinarily, entitled to considerable deference.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Brown was convicted in this court on March 29, 1988 and sentenced to death by electrocution for the double murder of a woman and her child after having previously being convicted of murder. Both the defendant and the victims were white and this case carried no racial overtones. "The record in this case shows that the venire from which the jury was struck consisted of 74 persons, 9 of which (including 1 black person) were excused from service by this court, and 7 of which (including 2 black people) were struck for cause. Three black persons actually served on the trial jury in this case and one of the alternate jurors was also black. Of the state's strikes in this case 20 of 23 were black. Of the defense strikes 1 of 23 were black. "After hearing and fully considering the legal arguments and factual data presented in this hearing, which the record shows, the Court finds that the State, through its Attorney General, Jimmy Evans, has articulated clear, cogent, and sound reasons for its peremptory strikes, all being racially neutral. In making this determination this court has specifically considered the demeanor of the sworn witness for the State, evidence at the hearing, and this court's knowledge of these proceedings as trial judge in this case. "In addition, this Court notes for the record in this case, that in the opinion of this Court, this defendant in all respects received a fair trial in this matter. "In conclusion, the Court finds that the reasons stated by the State i”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.