627 So. 2d 980 - Case v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘The trial court may, in its discretion, restrict the number of witnesses to establish a particular fact, at least where the fact is sufficiently established or is not controverted. The discretion must be an actual and judicial discretion, exercised in view of the special character and circumstances of the particular case.’ ””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. R.C. v. L.C. · 895 So. 2d 299 - Hall v. Hall

2. “"(a) A court which has jurisdiction under this article to make an initial or modification decree may decline to exercise its jurisdiction any time before making a decree if it finds that it is an inconvenient forum to make a custody determination under the circumstances of the case and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. "(b) A finding of inconvenient forum may be made upon the court's own motion or upon motion of a party or a guardian ad litem or other representative of the child. *Page 886 "(c) In determining if it is an inconvenient forum, the court shall consider if it is in the interest of the child that another state assume jurisdiction. For this purpose it may take into account the following factors, among others: "(1) If another state is or recently was the child's home state; "(2) If another state has a closer connection with the child and his family or with the child and one or more of the contestants; "(3) If substantial evidence concerning the child's present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships is more readily available in another state; "(4) If the parties have agreed on another forum which is no less appropriate; and "(5) If the exercise of jurisdiction by a court of this state would contravene any of the purposes stated in Section 30-3-21."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Ramsey v. Ramsey

3. “the latitude and extent of cross-examination is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and is reviewable on appeal only for prejudicial abuse.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hyche v. Medical Center East, Inc.