Ott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2003
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · United States v. Nobles · Weatherford v. Bursey · Alford v. United States · United States v. Rosner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hile jury service is vital and essential, ... some people called for jury service on relatively short notice, simply have insurmountable problems in serving in a particular week that must be recognized by the trial judge”). . See White v. State, 591 S.W.2d 851, 857 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (concluding that job-related excuses offered by five prospective jurors were not for”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State · Jones v. State“Appellant would have this court compare this case to such cases as U.S. v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200 (3rd Cir.1978); U.S. v. Zarzour, 432 F.2d 1 (5th Cir.1970); and Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545 , 97 S.Ct. 837 , 51 L.Ed.2d 30 (1977), which hold in general that the right to counsel is violated when law enforcement officers knowingly intercept confidential attorney-client communications and disclose these to the prosecution. The holdings in Levy and Zarz-ourtam on whether or not the intrusion was unlawful and for the sole purpose of determining defense strategy. That is just not the situation here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reeves v. State“"The court may hear any reasonable sworn excuse of a juror, and may release him entirely or until some other day of the term; provided, however, the court shall not excuse any juror for economic reasons unless all parties of record are present and approve such excuse.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.