Feldman v. Gogos’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2019
3 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon · Gartrell v. Gaylor · Burrell v. Newsome · Banks v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be set forth affirmatively in a responsive pleading”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We hold ... that when there is no substantial prejudice to the plaintiff, a defendant is not barred by Rule 8(c) from raising the statute of limitations in a pre-trial motion, even though the statute has not been raised in the defendant’s answer to the complaint.”); see also Fed. Mktg., 823 A.2d at 526 (no waiver of laches defense occasioned by failure to raise it in answer:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“If a defendant fails to assert the statute of limitations defense, the district court ordinarily should not raise it sua sponte.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cunningham v. Bathon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.