Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 A2D 86 - Bardoff v. United States

Bardoff v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

1 district · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Wilson-Bey v. United States (2006), Wagner v. Georgetown University Medical Center (2001)

1 district · 39 state decisions

220199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Washington v. Texas · Rock v. Arkansas · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on”), we are satisfied that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he Sixth Amendment does not guarantee criminal defendants the right to compel the attendance of any and all witnesses.” United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858 , 867 n. 7, 102 S.Ct. 3440 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1193 (1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.