Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 F.2d 1104 - Dodson v. Polk County

Dodson v. Polk County’s Empirical Analysis

628 F.2d 1104 · 1980

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Haines v. Kerner · Monroe v. Pape · Imbler v. Pachtman · Pierson v. Ray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Public defenders receive their power not because they are selected by their clients, but because they are employed by the County to represent a certain class of clients, who likely have little or no choice in selecting the lawyer who will defend them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.