Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries Inc Securities and Exchange Commission’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.2d 1368 · 1980
Citation profile
110 federal appellate · 73 district · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 367 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably Senate of Puerto Rico ex rel. Judiciary Committee v. United States Department of Justice (1987), United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1980)
110 federal appellate · 73 district · 46 state decisions — followed in 23 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7602
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Baxter v. Palmigiano · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · United States v. Morton Salt Co. · Jencks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 367 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not ordinarily require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings.”
28 later decisions quote this exact passage“information which would reveal the identities of witnesses or jurors, the substance of testimony, the strategy or direction of the investigation, the deliberation or questions of the jurors, and the like.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n the absence of substantial prejudice to the rights of the parties involved, simultaneous parallel civil and criminal proceedings are unobjectionable under our jurisprudence.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.