Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 F.2d 387 - Capital Films Corporation v. Charles Fries Productions, Inc. And American Broadcasting Company

Capital Films Corporation v. Charles Fries Productions, Inc. And American Broadcasting Company’s Empirical Analysis

628 F.2d 387 · 1980

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
4
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Ass'n (1993), Pignons Mecanique Precision v. Polaroid Corporation (1981)

44 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

59019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner · Jiro J. Enomoto, Etc. v. James C. Wright · Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. v. Diversified Packaging Corp. · Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc. · Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he motion shall be served at least ten days before the time fixed for the hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a company with a well established trade name and with the economic power to advertise extensively [would be immunized from suit] for a product name taken from a competitor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “infringer's use of plaintiff's mark results in confusion as to origin of plaintiff's product”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.