United States v. Bingham’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.2d 548 · 1980
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Higdon (1987), United States v. Lucas (1992)
24 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on United States v. Alsop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[E]xpress threats of bodily harm, threatening body motions, or the physical possibility of concealed weapon[s]' are not required for a conviction for bank robbery by intimidation.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the willful taking in such a way as would place an ordinary person in fear of bodily harm,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“she had 'three seconds' to give him the money in the top drawer, and then repeated this demand”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.