United States v. Bradsby’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.2d 901 · 1980
Citation profile
71 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Phillips (1981), United States v. Martino (1981)
71 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Russell · Sherman v. United States · Hampton v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here separate sentences on two or more counts are impermissible, the error is not cured by the existence of concurrent sentences.... Rather, in most instances the proper remedy is to vacate the sentences and remand to the district court for resentencing [properly].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“at best unseemly and at worst a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.