Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

628 F.2d 931

Docket No. 79-2679.

United States v. Michael

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 7, 1980.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1980-10-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1981

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Michael

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William S. Sutton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Ann T. Wallace, Atty., Appellate Sec., Criminal Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Albert M. Horn, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJO-FLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

¶5*932BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/628/f2d/931 · .json · Public domain