Constien v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.3d 1207 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2072
Relies on Bowles v. Russell · Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard · Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance · Bolden v. City of Topeka
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A notice of appeal filed after the court announces a decision or order-but before the entry of the judgment or order-is treated as filed on the date of and after entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Felders v. Bairett“[a] failure to set forth a judgment or order on a separate document when required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) does not affect the validity of an appeal from”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Felders v. Bairett“[e]ven when service is effected by use of the mail, only a nonparty can place the summons and complaint in the mail”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.