Doe v. Shurtleff’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.3d 1217 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Laird v. Tatum · Hudson v. United States · Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] regulation that serves purposes unrelated to the content of expression is deemed neutral, even if it has an incidental effect on some speakers or messages but not others.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Abbott · Ex parte Odom“(1) serve[ ] a substantial governmental interest and (2) [are] 'narrowly drawn' to serve that interest 'without unnecessarily interfering with First Amendment freedoms.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Abbott“Speech is chilled when an individual whose speech relies on anonymity is forced to reveal his identity as a pre-condition to expression.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Odom
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.