Ibarra v. Swacina’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.3d 1269 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Darby v. Cisneros · Pinho v. Gonzales · Mejia Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he decision on [the plaintiff's] adjustment of status is not yet final, as an adjustment of status 'decision is final where there are no deportation proceedings pending in which the decision might be reopened or challenged.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Darby v. Cisneros , 509 U.S. 137 , 146, 113 S.Ct. 2539 , 125 L.Ed.2d 113 (1993) (alteration added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“5 U.S.C. § 704 (alterations added). Judicial review is not available until”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.