Kellems v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.3d 215 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Squires-Allman v. Callahan · Rice v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court's remand made [the plaintiff] a 'prevailing party' for purposes of the EAJA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. W.M.V.C. v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.