Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

628 F.3d 705

Docket No. 09-40373.

Morgan v. Swanson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 17, 2010.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2010-12-17

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2025

1 district ·

4 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William Charles Bundren (argued), Wm. Charles Bundren & Associates, Frisco, TX, Jeffrey Carl Mateer, Gen. Counsel, Hiram S. Sasser, Liberty Institute, Plano, TX, Clyde Moody Siebman, Siebman, Burg, Phillips & Smith, L.L.P., Sherman, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

¶2Thomas Phillip Brandt (argued), Joshua Alan Skinner, Fanning, Harper, Martin-son, Brandt & Kutchin, P.C., Dallas, TX, Charles J. Crawford, Director, Abernathy, Roeder, Boyd & Joplin, P.C., McKinney, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

¶3Christopher Blewer Gilbert, Thompson & Horton, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Amicus Curiae, Texas Ass’n of Sch. Bds. Legal Assistance Fund.

¶4Paul D. Clement (argued), Ashley Charles Parrish, King & Spalding, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae, Edmonds and Snodgrass.

¶5Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

¶8It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/628/f3d/705 · .json · Public domain