Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 F.3d 991 - Johnson v. Astrue

Johnson v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

628 F.3d 991 · 2011

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security · Wagner v. Astrue · Pate-Fires v. Astrue · Gude v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consists of a series of check marks assessing residual functional capacity, a determination the ALJ must make, which are conclusory opinions that may be discounted if contradicted by other objective medical evidence in the record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if, and only if, it 'is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.