Affeldt v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2024
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Stump v. Sparkman · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Pulliam v. Allen · Pargoud v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Gag orders fall within the Court's prerogative to maintain appropriate decorum in the administration of justice and protect the rights of the litigants from prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the plaintiff must show that he has an inadequate remedy at law and a serious risk of irreparable harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“be caused to the administration of justice and the ability of the Magistrate to perform his duties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.