Rothberg v. Rosenbloom’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States · Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, NAACP · Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner · Miller v. Haynes · Armstrong v. Toler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of the insider trading scheme: 19 Although Rothberg did not come up with the specific details of the plans to trade on inside information, it was his pressure on David to come up with a means to make Rothberg more money, in short, his greed, that led to the scheme to trade on inside information.... 20 628 F.Supp. at 752-53. This unrealistically presupposes that the tippees contemplated by Bateman Eichler are not motivated by”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the David Rosenblooms of this world would be encouraged to borrow money for inside trading if they had a 'warranty' that they did not have to pay back their lenders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“preclusion of suit would not significantly interfere with the effective enforcement of the securities laws and protection of the investing public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.