Milot v. Haws’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Estelle v. McGuire · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · Bell Warden v. Cone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he circumstances of the commitment offense (or any other factors related to unsuitability) establish unsuitability if, and only if, those circumstances are probative to the determination that a prisoner remains a danger to the public.”). 14 . Indeed, petitioner conceded he had not participated in either Narcotics Anonymous or Alcoholics Anonymous since June 2003. Lodgment no. 4 at 29. 15 . See Lodgment no. 12 (Psychological report by H. Glazeroff, Ph.D., indicating petitioner ‘'currently represents an average risk of dangerousness if released to the community” and further stating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the futility of remanding a parole case for 're-review' when the habeas court already has reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to sustain an unsuitability finding has not escaped the state or federal courts” and citing cases). See also In re Rico, 171 Cal. App.4th 659 , 89 Cal.Rptr.3d 866 (2009) (directing Board to conduct a new parole suitability hearing within thirty days and to find petitioner suitable for parole”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When ... minor misconduct recurs after verbal counseling or if documentation of minor misconduct is needed, a description of the misconduct and counseling provided shall be documented on a CDC Form 128-A, Custodial Counseling Chrono.” See Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3312 (a)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.