Van Valin v. Locke’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1851 (Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1853 · 16 U.S.C. § 773 (Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982) · 16 U.S.C. § 773C (Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982) · 16 U.S.C. § 773E (Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Califano v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any resource allocation policy likely will result in some resource users feeling unfairly burdened with the costs of reducing their use of the resource. As the halibut resource has declined in abundance in Area 2C in recent years, the commercial longline fishery’s catch limits have been substantially reduced from 10,930,000 lbs [] in 2005 to 5,020,000 lbs [ ] in 2009. This represents a 54 percent reduction over four years. During part of this period (2005 through 2007) charter vessel anglers in Area 2C have had record high levels of harvest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.