Morris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. State · Modesitt v. State · Samuels v. State · Siglar v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Therefore, due to counsel's failure to object to any of the testimony regarding M.B.'s out-of-court allegations, Morris was convicted solely on the basis of M.B.'s out-of-court statements. We therefore find that Morris was denied effective assistance of counsel....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bannowsky v. State“that a proper objection to the testimony, if made, would have been sustained,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bannowsky v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.