Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 S.E.2d 31 - In Re DS

In Re DS’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 124 N.C. App. 332 - Starco, Inc. v. AMG Bonding & Insurance Services, Inc. · 158 N.C. App. 491 - In Re Baker · In Re JLK · In Re JLK · In re J.L.K.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “child have lost time together, the foster parents are in a state of flux, and the adoptive parents are not able to complete their family plan.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Respondent-mother, the minors, and the foster parent did not receive an immediate, final decision in a life altering situation for all parties. Respondent-mother could not appeal until entry of the order. If adoption becomes the ordered permanent plan for the minors, the foster parent must wait even longer to commence the adoption proceedings. The minors are prevented from settling into a permanent family environment until the order is entered and the time for any appeals has expired.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[highly] prejudicial to respondent-mother, the minors, and the foster parent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JJ

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.